Self-Regulated Learning Among MOOC Students – A Validation Study of the OSLQ in the Corporate E-Learning Environment of the Brazilian Federal Police
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18264/eadf.v16i1.2647Keywords:
Self-Regulated Learning, E-learning, MOOC, OSLQAbstract
The Brazilian Federal Police offers distance (e-learning) courses to train and specialize public security professionals. This study investigated self-regulated learning (SRL) characteristics in a population of 2,579 graduates from a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on the corporate platform ANP.net. Using the Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ), a statistically significant sample was obtained (n=335; 70.00% male; mean age 46.18 years). The overall reliability analysis of the original instrument showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha α=0.894). For validation in a new context, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated the need for model adjustments. The re-specified 19-item model demonstrated adequate fit indices (Cronbach's Alpha α=0.884; χ²/df = 1.857; RMSEA = 0.051; GFI = 0.920) , confirming its plausibility for this novel sample. The results indicate that: (1) the adoption of metacognitive strategies is the most frequent; (2) there are significant differences in SRL strategies between students with higher and lower OSLQ scores; and (3) there is a positive correlation between higher scores and course approval. The data reinforce that supporting SRL can enhance student performance in corporate e-learning environments.
Keywords: Self-regulated learning. MOOC. Corporate education. Public safety.
Downloads
References
ALLGOOD, W.et al.Factors that influence study. In R. F. Flippo y D. C. Caverly (Coord.), Handbook of college
reading and study strategy research, (pp. 201-219). NJ: LEA, 2000.
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICAÇÕES (Brasil). Relatório do Índice Brasileiro de Conectividade – IBC de
Brasília: Anatel, 2025. https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/paineis/meu-municipio/indice-brasileiro-deconectividade. Acesso em: 7 de maio 2025.
BANDURA, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, 1997.
BANDURA, A.; AZZI, R. G.; POLYDORO, S. Teoria Social Cognitiva: conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: ArtMed,
BARNARD, L.et al. Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and
Higher Education, 12, 1–6, 2009.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005. Acesso em 22 de out.
BARNARD, L.; OSLAND, V.; LAN, W. Profiles in Self-regulated Learning in the Online Learning Environment. The
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61-80, 2010.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769. Acesso em 22 de out. 2023.
BRANDÃO, C. R. O que é educação? 46ª ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2005.
BRASIL. Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos. Painel Estatístico de Pessoal do Governo
Federal. Brasília, [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://painel.pep.planejamento.gov.br/. Acesso em: 16 de abr. 2025.
BROADBENT, J.; POON, W. L. Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement in Online Higher
Education Learning Environments: a systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13, 2015.doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007. Acesso em 10 de abr. 2025.
BYRNE, B. M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd
ed.). Routledge, 2010.
CELIK, B.; CAGILTAY, K. Uncovering MOOC Completion: A Comparative Study of Completion Rates from
Different Perspectives. Open Praxis, 16(3), 445–456. 2024. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.3.606.
Acesso em 19 mar. 2025.
CORMIER, D. The CCK08 MOOC – Connectivism course, ¼ way. Dave’s Educational Blog [blog post 2 October],
CUNHA, R. M. R. daet al. Os recursos tecnológicos como potencializadores da interdisciplinaridade no espaço
escolar. Revista Ciências Humanas, 5 (1 e 2), 2013.https://www.rchunitau.com.br/index.php/rch/article/view/42. Acesso em 15 de dez. 2023.
DA SILVA, J. C.; DRUMOND E CASTRO, M. C. Dimensões relacionadas à evasão na educação a distância: análise
de uma proposta de categorização. Revista Valore, 7, 217–252. 2022. https://doi.org/10.22408/reva7020221387217-252. Acesso em 22 de mar. 2025.
DELEN, E.; LIEW, J. The use of interactive environments to promote self-regulation in online learning: A
Literature Review. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 24-33, 2016.DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.15.24. Acesso em 22 de mar. 2025.
DIEP, N. A.et al. Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy,
and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84–101, 2016. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.002. Acesso em 15 de dez. 2023.
DOIDGE, N. O cérebro que se transforma. Editora Record, 2016.
Características da Aprendizagem Autorregulada de Alunos de MOOC: Estudo de Validação do OSLQ no Ambiente de E-Learning Corporativo da Polícia Federal ESCOLA NACIONAL DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA (Brasil). EV.G em números. Brasília, DF: Enap, 2025. Disponível em: https://emnumeros.escolavirtual.gov.br/. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2025.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa. 54ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora
Paz e Terra, 2016.
FUNG, J. J.; YUEN, M.; YUEN, A. H. Validity evidence for a Chinese version of the online self-regulated learning
questionnaire with average students and mathematically talented students.Measurement and Evaluation in
Counseling and Development, 51(2), 111–124. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1358056.
Acesso em 22 de out. 2025.
HANDOKO, E.et al.Goal setting and MOOC completion: A study on the role of self-regulated learning in student
performance in massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
Learning, 20(3). 2019. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270. Acesso em 5 de jan. 2025.
HU, L. T.; BENTLER, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria
versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55, 1999. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118. Acesso em 5 de jan. 2025.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (Brasil). Censo 2022: panorama. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE,
Disponível em: https://censo2022.ibge.gov.br/panorama/. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2025.
JORDAN, K. Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341–358, 2015.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112. Acesso em 16 abr. 2025.
KILIS, S.; YILDIRIM, Z. Online Self-regulation Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish
Translation.Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, vol.47, no.1, 233-245, 2018. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.298791. Acesso em 22 de out. 2023.
KIZILCEC, R. F.; PÉREZ-SANAGUSTÍN, M. J.; MALDONADO, J. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner
behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, Volume 104, pp 18-33,
ISSN 0360-1315. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001. Acesso em 22 de out. 2023.
KLINE, R. B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press, 2016.
LEITE, L. S.et al.Tecnologia educacional: descubra suas possibilidades na sala de aula. 2ª ed. Petrópolis: Vozes,
LÉVY, P. Cibercultura. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2010.
LITTLEJOHN, A.et al. Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning. The Internet and Higher
Education, [s. l.], v. 29, p. 29-35. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2025.
MARTINEZ-LOPEZ, R.et al.Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire in a Russian MOOC. Computers in
Human Behavior. Volume 75, pp 966-974, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.015. Acesso em 22
de out. 2023.
MATAR, J. Aprendizagem em ambientes virtuais: teorias, conectivismo e MOOC. Teccogs –Revista Digital de
Tecnologias Cognitivas, nº 7 (jan-jun, 2013). Revistas da PUC-SP, 2013.https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teccogs/article/view/52846. Acesso em 22 de out. 2023.
MATTA, C. E. da; FIGUEIREDO, A. P. S. Mooc: Transformação das práticas de aprendizagem. In: ESUD – X
Congresso Brasileiro de Ensino Superior a Distância Belém/PA, p. 1 - 15, junho 2013 – UNIREDE., 2013.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1392.8086. Acesso em 15 de jan. 2025.
MOYA, M. Los MOOC/COMA: Un nuevo reto educativo para el siglo XXI. Una metodología didáctica para el
aprendizaje en línea.Virtualis, 4(8), 84–103, 2013.https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7085449.
Acesso em 5 de jan. 2025.
OLIVEIRA, S. G.; ALMEIDA, V. E. de; TROTTA, L. M. As tecnologias e o mundo globalizado: reflexões sobre o
cotidiano contemporâneo.Revista Educação Pública, v. 20, nº 2., 2020.DOI: https://doi.org/10-18264/REP.
Acesso em 10 de jan. 2025.
PINTO-SANTUBER, C.et al.Cuestionario de autorregulación del aprendizaje en línea (Online Self-regulated
Learning Questionnaire, OSLQ): estudio de validez y fiabilidad de la versión en español.Estudios pedagógicos
(Valdivia), 46(2), 251-266, 2020.http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052020000200251. Acessoem 10 de jan.
de 2025.
PINTRICH, P. R. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner
(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, Academic Press, San Diego (2000), pp. 451-502, 2000.
PNUD; IPEA; FJP. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil 2021. Brasília: PNUD, 2022.
http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/. Acesso em 14 de abr. 2025.
REICH, J. MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. EDUCAUSE Review, 12(8),
MOOC Completion and Retention in the Context of Student Intent | EDUCAUSE Review.Acesso em 22 de
out. 2023.
RODRIGUES, R. L.et al.Validação de um instrumento de mensuração de autorregulação da aprendizagem em
contexto brasileiro usando análise fatorial confirmatória. Revista Novas Tecnologias Na Educação,14(1),
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-1916.67337. Acesso em 5 de jan. de 2025.
RODRIGUES, H.et al.Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review. Computers &
Education, Volume 136, Pages 87-98, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007. Acesso em: 16
abr. 2025.
ROTH, A.; OGRIN, S.; SCHMITZ, B. Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature
review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 225–250,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2.Acesso em 10 de jan. 2025.
SCHUNK, D. H. Self-Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist,
(2), 85–94, 2005.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3. Acesso em 10 de jan. 2025.
SIEMENS, G. MOOC are really a platform. Elearnspace, 2012.
SILVA, S. W.et al.E-learning e educação corporativa: a análise de um programa a partir do princípio da
conectividade. Revista ESPACIOS, Vol. 37 (Nº 26),
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/123456789/3370. Acesso em 5 de jan.2025.
TAGHIZADE, A.; AZIMI, E.; MIRZAEE, R. Validity Evidence for a Persian Version of the Online Self-Regulated
Learning Questionnaire. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci;11(1):13-24,
https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2020.84802.1017. Acesso em 5 de jan. 2025.
TEMPELAAR, D. T.; RIENTIES, B.; GIESBERS, B. In search for the most informative data for feedback generation:
Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038. Acesso em 5 de jan. 2025.
TOMASELLO, M. Origens culturais da aquisição do conhecimento humano. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
ZHANG, W.; LIU, B.; WILSON, A. J. Examining Chinese EFL learners’ online self-regulated learning: A mixedmethods approach, System, Volume 123-103277, 2024.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103277. Acesso
em 5 de jan. 2025.
ZHONGGEN, Y. The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the
COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1),
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2025.
ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp.
-39). Academic press, 2000.
ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70,
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EaD em Foco

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Revista EaD em Foco receive the license
Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
All subsequent publications, complete or partial, must be made with the acknowledgment, in citations, of the Revista EaD em Foco as the original editor of the article.






