Guia Para Realizar uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura

Chitu Okoli, Traduzido por:David Wesley Amado Duarte, Revisão técnica e introdução:João Mattar

Resumo


Muitos pesquisadores não são bem treinados na realização de uma revisão de literatura autônoma, um documento acadêmico que resume e sintetiza na sua totalidade o conhecimento anterior de um corpo de pesquisa. Numerosos guias que existem para pesquisa em sistemas de informação (SI) concentram-se somente em certas partes do processo; poucos abrangem todo o processo. Este artigo apresenta uma metodologia rigorosa e padronizada para a revisão sistemática de literatura (também chamada de revisão sistemática) para pesquisadores em SI. Este guia abrangente amplia a metodologia básica das ciências da saúde e outros campos com numerosas adaptações para atender às necessidades de campos metodologicamente diversos, como a pesquisa em SI, especialmente aqueles que envolvem, incluem e sintetizam estudos quantitativos e qualitativos. Além disso, este guia fornece muitos exemplos da pesquisa em SI e referências a guias com mais detalhes úteis para a realização de uma revisão de literatura rigorosa e valiosa. Embora seja adaptado à pesquisa em SI, é suficientemente amplo para ser aplicável e valioso para pesquisadores de qualquer campo das ciências sociais.


Palavras-chave: Revisões de literatura. Revisões sistemáticas. Revisão sistemática de literatura. Pesquisa em sistemas de informação.

_____________________________________________________________

Tradução de: OKOLI, Chitu.

A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, v. 37, n. 43, p. 879–910, nov. 2015. Disponível em: <http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol37/iss1/43/>.

Autorizada pela Association for Information Systems - Copyright © 2015 

_____________________________________________________________

A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review

Abstract


Many scholars are not well trained in conducting a standalone literature review, a scholarly paper that in its entirety summarizes and synthesizes knowledge from a prior body of research. Numerous guides that exist for information systems (IS) research mainly concentrate on only certain parts of the process; few span the entire process. This paper introduces the rigorous, standardized methodology for the systematic literature review (also called systematic review) to IS scholars. This comprehensive guide extends the base methodology from the health sciences and other fields with numerous adaptations to meet the needs of methodologically diverse fields such as IS research, especially those that involve including and synthesizing both quantitative and qualitative studies. Moreover, this guide provides many examples from IS research and provides references to guides with further helpful details for conducting a rigorous and valuable literature review. Although tailored to IS research, it is sufficiently broad to be applicable and valuable to scholars from any social science field.

 

Keywords: Literature reviews. Systematic reviews. Systematic literature reviews. Information systems research.


Palavras-chave


Revisões de literatura; Revisões sistemáticas; Revisão sistemática de literatura; Pesquisa em Sistemas de Informação

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


ALAVI, M. & CARLSON, P. A review of MIS research and disciplinary

development. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 8(4), p. 45-62, 1992.

ALAVI, M. & JOACHIMSTHALER, E. A. Revisiting DSS implementation research: a meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers. MIS Quarterly, v. 16(1), p. 95-116, 1992.

ALAVI, M. & LEIDNER, D. E. Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, v. 25(1), p. 107-136, 2001.

ALIAS, M.; ZURINAH, C.; REISKA, A. J.; ÅHLBERG, M. & NOVAK, J. D. (2008). Concept mapping: A tool for creating a literature review. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Concept Mapping. 2008.

ALLEN, N.; ATKINSON, D.; MORGAN, M.; MOORE, T. & SNOW, C. What experienced collaborators say about collaborative writing. Journal of

Business and Technical Communication, v. 1(2), p. 70-90, 1987.

ANONYMOUS. “Gray literature” forces new role on librarians (sidebar). Chemical & Engineering News, v. 76(20), n. 12, 1998.

BACHARACH, S. B. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation.

Academy of Management Review, v. 14(4), p. 496-515, 1989.

BANDARA, W.; FURTMUELLER, E.; GORBACHEVA, E.; MISKON, S. &

BEEKHUYZEN, J. Achieving rigor in literature reviews: insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, v. 37, p. 154-204, 2015.

BARBOUR, R. S. Checklists for improving rigor in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, v. 322(7.294), p. 1.115-1.117, 2001.

BEM, D. J. Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, v. 118, p. 172-172, 1995.

BOOTE, D. N. & BEILE, P. Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, v. 34(6), p. 3-15, 2005.

BORENSTEIN, M.; HEDGES, L. V.; HIGGINS, J. P. T. & ROTHSTEIN, H. R. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley, 2009.

BRAGGE, J.; RELANDER, S.; SUNIKKA, A. & MANNONEM, P. Enriching literature reviews with computer-assisted research mining. Case: Profiling group support systems research. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (v. 40, p. 243a-243a). New York: IEEE, 2007.

BRERETON, P.; KIKCHENHAM, B. A.; BUDGEN, D.; TURNER, M. & KHALIL, M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. The Journal of Systems & Software, v.80(4), p. 571-583, 2007.

COTTON, J. L. & TUTTLE, J. M. Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, v. 11, p. 55-70, 1986.

DAWSON, K. & FERDIG, R. E. Commentary: Expanding notions of acceptable research evidence in educational technology: A response to Schrum et al. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, v. 6(1), p. 133-142, 2006.

DONOVAN, S. K. The importance of resubmitting rejected papers. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, v. 38(3), p. 151-155, 2007.

DUBÉ, L. & PARÉ, G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, v.27(4), p. 597-636, 2003.

DUNHAM, R. B. Shift work: A review and theoretical analysis. The Academy of Management Review, v. 2(4), p. 624-634, 1977.

ERDURAN, S.; SIMON, S. & OSBORNE, J. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, v. 88(6), p. 915-933, 2004.

FIGG, W. D.; DUNN, L.; LIEWEHR, D. J.; STEINBERG, S. M.; THURMAN, P. W.;

BARRET, J. C. & BIRKINSHAW, J. Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles. Pharmacotherapy, v. 26(6), p. 759- 767, 2006.

FINK, A. Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2005.

GREEN, B. F. & HALL, J. A. Quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Reviews in Psychology, v. 35(1), p. 37-54, 1984.

GREEN, R. & BOWSER, M. Observations from the field: Sharing a literature review rubric. Journal Of Library Administration, v. 45(1/2), p. 185-202, 2006.

GRIFFIN, R. W.; WELSH, A. & MOORHEAD, G. Perceived task characteristics and employee performance: A literature review. The Academy of Management Review, v. 6(4), p. 655-664, 1981.

HART, C. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research

imagination. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.

HARTLEY, J.; PENNEBAKER, J. W. & FOX, C. Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? Scientometrics, v. 57(3), p. 389-398, 2003.

HELMERICKS, S. G.; NELSEN, R. L. & UNNITHAN, N. P. The researcher, the topic, and the literature: A procedure for systematizing literature searches. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, v. 27(3), p. 285-294, 1991.

HÜTTNER, J. The genre(s) of student writing: Developing writing models.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 18(2), p. 146-165, 2008.

HYLAND, K. Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in

academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 54(3), p. 251-259, 2003.

JACCARD, J. & JACOBY, J. Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York: The Guilford Press, 2010.

JACSÓ, P. The dimensions of cited reference enhanced database subsets. Online Information Review, v. 31(5), p. 694-705, 2007.

JASPERSON, J.; CARTE, T. A.; SAUNDERS, C. S.; BUTLER, B. S.; CROES, H. J. P.& ZHENG, W. Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, v. 26(4), p. 397 459, 2002.

JOSEPH, D.; Ng, K. Y.; KOH, C. & ANG, S. Turnover of information technology professionals: a narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. Management Information Systems Quarterly, v. 31(3), n. 7, 2007.

KEEN, S. Strategies for disseminating qualitative research findings: Three

exemplars. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, v. 8(3), 2007. Retrieved from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/285/625

KEKÄLE, T.; WEERD-NEDERHOF, P. de; CERVAI, S. & BORELLI, M. The “dos and don’ts” of writing a journal article. Journal of Workplace Learning, v. 21(1), p. 71-80, 2009.

KITCHENHAM, B. & CHARTERS, S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report No.EBSE-2007-01). Keele: Keele University, 2007.

KITCHENHAM, B.; BRERETON, O. P.; BUDGEN, D.; TURNER, M.; BAILEY, J. & LINKMAN, S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering — a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, v. 51(1), p. 7-15, 2009.

KLEIN, H. K. & MYERS, M. D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, v. 23(1), p. 67-93, 1999.

LEE, D.; KANG, J.; MITRA, P.; GILES, C. L. & ON, B.-W. Are your citations clean? Communications of the ACM, v. 50(12), p. 33-38, 2007.

LEIDNER, D. E. & KAYWORTH, T. A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, v. 30(2), p. 357-399, 2006.

LEVY, Y. & ELLIS, T. J. A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science, v. 9, p. 181-212, 2006.

LIMM L. H. & BENBASAT, I. A theoretical perspective of negotiation support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 9(3), p.27-44, 1992.

MARAKAS, G. M.; YI, M. Y. & JOHNSON, R. D. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, v. 9(2), p. 126-163, 1998.

MAXWELL, J. A. Literature reviews of, and for, educational research: A

Commentary on Boote and Beile’s “scholars before researchers”. Educational Researcher, v. 35(9), p. 28-31, 2006.

MELVILLE, N.; KRAEMER, K. & GURBAXANI, V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, v. 28(2), p. 283-322, 2004.

MORRISON, E. W. & BIES, R. J. Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, v. 16(3), p. 522-541, 1991.

MYERS, P. M. D. Qualitative research in business & management

(illustrated edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008.

NORRIS, M.; OPPENHEIM, C. & ROWLAND, F. Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR. Online Information Review, v. 32(6), p. 709-715, 2008.

OKOLI, C. A critical realist guide to developing theory with systematic literature reviews. SSRN eLibrary, 2012. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2115818.

OKOLI, C. & ABRAMSCH, K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. SSRN eLibrary, 2010. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1954824.

PAWSON, R.; GREENHALGH, T.; HARVEY, G. & WALSHE, K. Realist review-a new

method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions.

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, v. 10, p. 21-34, 2005.

PETTICREW, M. & ROBERTS, H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.

PETTY, M. M.; McGEE, G. W. & CAVENDER, J. W. A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual

performance. Academy of Management Review, v. 9(4), p. 712-721, 1984.

PICCOLI, G. & Ives, B. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, v. 29(4), p. 747-776, 2005.

PIERCE, J. L. & DUNHAM, R. B. Task design: A literature review. Academy of Management Review, v. 1(4), p. 83-97, 1976.

POPE, C.; MAYS, N. & POPAY, J. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: A guide to methods. New York: McGraw-Hill

International, 2007.

REMPEL, H. G. & DAVIDSON, J. Providing information literacy instruction to graduate students through literature review workshops. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2008.

RIDLEY, D. The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. London:Sage, 2012.

ROBEY, D.; IM, G. & WARAMEH, J. D. Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 9(9), p. 497-518, 2008.

RODGERS, R. & HUNTER, J. E. The discard of study evidence by literature reviewers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, v. 30(3), p. 329-345, 1994.

ROSENTHAL, R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand

Oaks: Sage, 1991.

ROSENTHAL, R. Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, v. 118,

p. 183-183, 1995.

ROSENTHAL, R. & DIMATTEO, M. R. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Reviews in Psychology, v. 52(1), p. 59-82, 2001.

ROUSSEAU, D. M.; MANNING, J. & DENYER, D. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. SSRN eLibrary, 2008. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1309606.

SHENKAR, O. & ZEIRA, Y. Human resources management in international joint ventures: Directions for research. Academy of Management Review, v.12(3), p. 546-557, 1987.

SINGH, G.; HADDAD, K. M. & CHOW, C. W. Are articles in “top” management journals necessarily of higher quality? Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 16(4), p. 319-331, 2007.

STERNE, J. A. C.; EGGER, M. & SMITH, G. D. Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ, 323(7303), 42-46,2001.

SYLVESTER, A.; TATE, M. & JOHNSTONE, D. Beyond synthesis: Re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour &

InformationTechnology, v. 32(12), p. 1-17, 2011.

TÉENI, D. Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, v. 25(2), p. 251-312, 2001.

THORNLEY, C. & GIBB, F. Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR). Journal of Documentation, v. 65(1), p. 133-150, 2009.

TURNER, M.; KITCHENHAM, B.; BUDGEN, D. & BRERETON, O. P. Lessons learnt undertaking a largescale systematic literature review. In Proceedings of EASE (vol. 8), 2008.

VTSHENKA, V.; DAVIS, F. D. & MPRRIS, M. G. Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 8(4), p. 267-286, 2007.

VOM BROCKE, J.; SIMONS, A.; NIEHAVES, B.; RIEMER, K.; PLATTFAUT, R. &CLEVEN, A. Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, 2009.

VOM BROCKE, J.; SIMONS, A.; RIEMER, K.; NIEHAVES, B.; PLATTFAUT, R. & CLEVEN, A. Standing on the shoulders of giants: Challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, v. 37, p. 205-224, 2015.

WADE, M. & HULLAND, J. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, v. 28(1), p. 107-142, 2004.

WEBSTER, J. & WATSON, R. T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, v. 26(2), p. xiii-xxiii, 2002.

WINTER, S. J. & TAYLOR, S. L. The role of IT in the transformation of work: A comparison of postindustrial, industrial, and proto-industrial organization. Information Systems Research, v. 7(1), p. 5-21, 1996.

WOLFSWINKELl, J. F.; FURTMUELLER, E. & WILDEROM, C. P. M. Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 22(1), p. 45-55, 2011.

WU, F. & WELD, D. S. Automatically refining the Wikipedia infobox ontology. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 635-644). ACM, 2008.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18264/eadf.v9i1.748



Direitos autorais 2019 EAD EM FOCO

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Universidades consorciadas